Thursday, 4 November 2021

 



Tales from Longford: The Weekly House

This house and the village of Longford in West Middlesex will be demolished when the third runway at Heathrow airport is built.


The Weekly House 2018.

It had been ten years since the Great Fire of London, and Thomas Weekly, a wealthy London cloth-merchant was looking for a change in lifestyle. His ride along the Great Bath Road from his home in Westminster led him to the village of Longford, fifteen miles from London, in search of a farm that was for sale in the centre of the village.  Recently married he wanted to build a home for his bride and establish himself as a farmer and maltster.  As a Baptist, and a descendant of John Wycliffe, the medieval theological reformer, he was attracted to this village of non-conformists, who were now openly able to meet without fear of prosecution.

Thomas Weekly bought the farm and built the Weekly House as a family home. It was quite different from the timber-framed Tudor inns and houses that already existed in the village. The house was two storeys high and built of red-brick with two attic rooms, and a high pitched tiled roof. The walls were thick and the large sash windows had internal wooden shutters.

The two main rooms had huge beamed fireplaces large enough to stand-up in, with recesses in the chimney for smoking hams. These fireplaces and those of the bedrooms all connected to the central chimney. The beautiful staircase with wooden bannisters continued up to the attic on the second floor where there were two large attics rooms and a box room. On the northern side of the ground floor was a single-storey cool store room with hooks for storing hams and next to that a white washed dairy. On the eastern wall of the house was a large single-storey kitchen with a huge fireplace matching the one on the other side of the wall in the main house. As well as the kitchen, there was a boot room, log store and outside privy.

Next to the house, parallel to the Great Bath Road, Thomas Weekly built a long, weather-boarded malting barn, and separating the barn from the road was a brick-built wall with sloped and rounded coping.

Grade II listed barn next to Weekly House 2018.
Thomas Weekly and his family, lived in this house from the end of the seventeenth century, until the last surviving Weekly died in the house in 1899. After that the house and land was inherited by their cousins, the Wilds, who occupied the house until 1940. During the war the empty building was used as an ARP Warden’s post, and also an HQ for the local Home Guard. It suffered damage to the roof in 1944 when a flying bomb landed nearby and debris hit the Weekly House. After the roof was patched up the house stood empty. All its farmland had been compulsorily requisitioned to build a war-time airport in the neighbouring hamlet of Heathrow. In 1948 the Weekly House was bought by a local resident, Christopher Challis, who set about restoring it, with the help of the local blacksmith, Tom Adams, and made it into a family home once more. It is for this reason the house has survived. The house is now an office building and the House, barn and wall are now all grade II listed structures. The barn, now overgrown and derelict, is now on the Historic England’s Heritage at Risk Register 2020.

When Thomas Weekly journeyed to Longford in 1676 he was not to know that he had founded a dynasty that continued for three centuries in the village of Longford. The family saw the village prosper and grow, and witnessed many historic events on the only road through the village, The Great Bath Road.


The Weekly House when it was a working farm.
Early twentieth century

My book, Longford: A Village on the Edge of Extinction, which tells the story of Longford over the last three hundred years, is due for publication soon.


Friday, 29 October 2021

 

Tales from Longford: The Strawberry Season

The village of Longford in West Middlesex will be demolished when the third runway at Heathrow airport is built.  

  
Zion Cottage

At first light, the front door of Zion Cottage opened on a glorious June morning in 1900.  Mrs Clara Brain, dressed in a shawl and head scarf with a white apron over her long black skirt, walked towards The Farm in the centre of Longford.  Even though it was 3am she were joined by a growing stream of similarly dressed women all moving in the same direction. The village was quiet as most residents had yet to begin their morning routine.  When the women reached the field they replaced their white aprons with coarse hessian sacks, criss-crossed their shawls across their bodies, under their arms and tied them at the back. They pulled their long skirts up between their legs and hitched them into the front of the waistband.  In the field, the boy from the village with his wooden rattle had been scaring the birds away since first light.  He was pleased to have some company.  The women immediately set to work.  The foreman allocated a row of strawberry plants to each girl.  He handed out wooden punnets and the girls picked the ripest fruit handling only the stem. The punnets were lined with a strawberry leaves before the fruit was laid gently on top.  Later in the packing shed, each punnet would be weighed to make sure it weighed exactly a pound, then 36 punnets would be packed in a wooden crate and the lid nailed down.  About sixty of these crates would be stacked ten-high on a lightweight yellow strawberry van that with one fast horse could travel the fifteen miles along the Bath Road to Covent Garden market in one and a half-hours.  Strawberries with the dew still on them would sell at a premium price in the market.


 


Fruit was one of the main produce of the market gardens in West Middlesex in the nineteenth century, but there was often a glut.  An enterprising farmer in nearby Sipson, Jonathon Smith, had started a Jam Factory there in the 1890s which would buy any farm surpluses.  One of the main crops in mid-summer was strawberries.  The berries ripened in the open fields where the strawberry plants were laid out in long rows and the plants packed with straw around them so that the slugs could not reach the ripe fruit.  The strawberry-picking season was relatively short, but labour intensive, and because the plants were at ground level, back-breaking.  The warm sun of mid-summer made the job easier, but in pouring rain it was unpleasant work.  Women were regarded as the best pickers of strawberries because of their light touch and Longford had an army of women who would rise at dawn to pick them.

 

Clara Brain was born in Weston on the Green, Oxfordshire, in 1856. She and  married the boy next door, West Brain, in 1889 when they were both 33 and moved to Longford  before the end of the century. Her husband worked as an agricultural labourer for H.J. Wild the biggest employer in Longford. Most of the farmland is now under Heathrow airport, but the main farmhouse still survives as the Grade II listed Weekly House.  West Brain was always known as Brother Brain because of his way of greeting people by calling them ‘brother’.  He was a lifelong Baptist and never missed going to chapel every Sunday.  His employer described him as a “salt of the earth”.  West died in Longford at the age of 87. Clara worked in the fields at harvest times, but was mostly a housewife. She won prizes for her bread and pastry-making in local produce shows.  She died in Longford aged 90 in 1947.

My book, Longford: A Village on the Edge of Extinction, is due for publication soon. 

Saturday, 28 August 2021

The King and the Eton Montem

 

Montem mound 2020 from Google Streetview

The second Tuesday in June 1832 was a dull cloudy day, but that did not dampen the excitement felt by eighteen-year-old Richard Weekly, as he mounted his horse in the farmyard at Perry Oaks farm (now under Terminal Five at London Airport) and set off along Tithe Barn lane towards the Great Bath Road.  Richard was taking a rare day off from helping his father run their 300-acre farm.  He rode west along the Bath Road, through Longford and at Colnbrook Bridge was stopped by two Eton schoolboys, called Thackeray and Walker, who were dressed in mock military uniforms. "Give us some salt", they demanded.  Richard was expecting this and good-humouredly handed over some coins.  They were raising charitable donations for the event Richard was about to witness. In return he was given a yellow ticket on which was printed, “Pro More et Monte – Vivant Rex et Regina.”  He stuck the ticket in his hat knowing it would exempt him from any more requests for “salt” and continued his journey.  As he approached the village of Slough, Berkshire, the roads got busier with excited crowds of people and riders. Gaily decorated carriages lined the roads from Windsor to Slough.  Richard eventually found a vantage point where he stopped to view the event that everyone had come to see.

Every three years the boys of Eton College dressed in bizarre clothes marched from the school to an Anglo-Saxon burial mound at Salt Hill,  on the Great Bath Road, where they climbed the mound and performed a mock ceremony. They called the ceremony ad montem (to the mountain), and Montem is the name of the sports centre and ice-rink that now stands nearby.

At eleven o’clock six hundred Eton schoolboys were assembled in the quadrangle at Eton College for the arrival of the seven carriages carrying the Royal Party.  The King had been asked for “salt” at Eton Bridge and had handed over 50 guineas before continuing to the college.  The Montem event, conveniently timed for The Court’s relocation to Windsor for the summer, was witnessed by King William IV and Queen Adelaide and their royal visitors.  They were joined by the Provost and other exclusive guests to watch the boys, who were all assembled in various forms of fancy dress, parade three times around the square in front of the King, until a heavy shower sent the Royal Party into the college to watch the ceremonial flag waving from the windows.  Then the procession started.

Richard Weekly watched as first a schoolboy called Brown and four attendants dressed in Spanish dresses led the parade, followed by the Band of Scotch [sic] Fusilier guards. Then the school Captain, Williams, marched ahead of a group of boys dressed in Greek costume.  Another boy, calling himself the Sergeant Major, in mock-military attire, was accompanied by boys in Indian costume. The parade continued with some boys in military-type uniforms with swords and plumes, and other boys in various forms of fancy dress. Following this motley crew was the band of the First Life Guards and then a pupil calling himself an Ensign with an escort of boys dressed as Highlanders.  Boy musicians were followed by boys dressed in Robin Hood-style Lincoln-green velvet.  Behind the marchers were the carriages of the Royal party, and then an endless line of carriages carrying the nobility and gentry.

Around two in the afternoon the procession arrived at Salt Hill where the King and Queen received a huge welcoming cheer and as they stayed in their carriages the boys once again paraded before them around the Mound.  Then a detachment of boys including the flag bearer climbed the mound, unfurled the flag and waved to endless applause.  With the ceremony now over, the Royal carriages returned to Windsor, and the boys adjourned for refreshments to The Windmill coaching inn across the Bath Road from the Mound.  The Windmill had extensive ornamental gardens around which, after lunch, the boys would normally promenade, but this year a heavy shower of rain prevented that.  Now, soaked and bedraggled,  the boys like a miniature routed army, made their way back towards Eton, the mud and slush underfoot spoiling their elaborate costumes.  About a £1000 had been raised in “salt” and after defraying expenses what was left went to R.D. Williams, Captain of the school, and son of the bookseller and publisher of the Eton Classics.  It was to pay for his education at Cambridge University.

Richard Weekly pulled his hat down hard over his face to stop the torrents of rain hitting his face as he rode the six miles back to Perry Oaks to relate all the sights and sounds of what he had seen to his parents and sister.

The triannual event and the crowds it attracted, was already a magnet for pickpockets and pilferers.  As the years went by and the opening of the Great Western Railway Station at Slough in 1838 bought hordes more sightseers from London for the event by1841 and 1844 the multitude of people became unmanageable. Few of the Londoners understood the age-old tradition of giving “salt” and refused to contribute. By 1847 the Provost and Head-master of Eton College proposed to end the ceremony and give the Captain of the school a gratuity instead.  This sparked protests from former Etonians and a petition was sent to Queen Victoria, but without success and the long history of the Eton Montem, probably derived from a pagan festival, came to an end.

The Windmill hotel

Windmill Hotel, Bath Road, Salt Hill, Slough, about 1850. From Slough Library collection

The original Windmill hotel, a staging post for coaches on the Bath Road, was burnt down in 1882 and a new pub with the same name was built on the site by the brewery owners.  This was demolished in 2000 and now the name is preserved in a purpose-built Care Centre.

Sources:

Windsor and Eton Express - Saturday 16 June 1832, and other contemporary newspapers.

Richard Weekly’s diary (in possession of the author)

http://www.sloughhistoryonline.org.uk/

 

Saturday, 2 January 2021

 

The King, the Assassin, and the Wax Woman.

The first day of Ascot, 19 June 1832, was a dull damp day as King William IV and Queen Adelaide drove down the race course in their carriage procession to watch the races from the Royal Stand. As the King got out of his carriage the military band struck up the National Anthem and he ascended the steps to the Royal Box as fast as his portly 66-year-old body would let him. The usual enthusiastic welcome was subdued and looking around he could see few of the familiar faces of his Lords with their ladies who usually attended. He was puzzled at first until he remembered that he had signed into law the Great Reform Act twelve days earlier.  This Act, so long resisted by the House of Lords, reformed the electoral procedure, making the election of Members of Parliament a fair representation of the people. Was the poor attendance at Ascot a sign of disapproval of the King or just in response to the poor weather? Whatever the reason that day would be remembered for its violent turn of events.



Inspite of the weather and the poor welcome the King was determined to enjoy the racing. The first race, a short one with just two contestants, was easily won by the favourite, Ida. While they waited for the next race the Royal couple were in conversation with their guests when a one-legged dishevelled man, in tattered sailors clothing looking up at the royal box from the crowd below took a flint stone, the size of a potato, from his pocket and hurled the missile directly towards the King.  The stone hit the monarch on the forehead just above the rim of his hat, which probably saved him from major injury. Nevertheless the sound of the impact was loud and the King was stunned and falling back, exclaiming “My God! I am hit!” just as another stone was thrown which missed the King and hit the woodwork. The King was led to a chair where he took off his hat and with the first sign of a bruise starting to appear declared himself unhurt, much to the relief of his party, some of whom had burst into tears in shock.

The would-be assassin was set upon and handed over to Bow-street officers (the police force at the time) who removed him to the magistrate’s room under the stand. When news of the attack permeated through the crowd they pushed forward towards the foot of the royal stand and their horror turned to relief when just minutes later the King made an appearance to show he was unharmed. The sight of such a large crowd bursting into elated cheers of relief moved the King to tears.

The perpetrator, now a subdued wretch awaiting his fate, was examined by the magistrates. He admitted the offence and insisted he had no accomplices. Witnesses, including some from the Royal party, gave evidence after which the Magistrates concluded this was an assassination attempt and therefore High Treason. He was sent to prison at Abingdon.

 Dennis Collins by Thomas Fairland, 1842 NPG D34047. National Portrait Gallery.

 

Meanwhile the King, now fully recovered, and the Queen, stayed watching the racing until nearly six o’clock in the evening. In contrast to their arrival when they departed from the royal stand they left to a crescendo of enthusiastic cheers from all classes. The event caused a wave of public affection for the King after months of division during the long political wrangling before the passing of the Reform Bill.[1]

Although at the time the incident was regarded as a highly treasonable assassination attempt, subsequently historians have dismissed it as a minor stone-throwing incident caused by discontent over the Reform Bill, but it was more than that. It was a cry for help.

The would-be assassin, Dennis Collins was put on trial at Abingdon, on Wednesday, the 22nd of August. He was charged on several counts with assaulting his Majesty, with intent to kill and murder him, with intent to maim and disable him, and with intent to do him some grievous bodily harm. Prior to the trial there was a debate about his sanity and he himself said twice in his lifetime he had been confined as a lunatic, but he believed he suffered from a “hot and irritable temper” caused by the injustice he met from authority.[2]  Any suspicions about his state of mind were dispelled at his trial when he appeared dressed smartly and with a new wooden leg made for the occasion. In his defence the prisoner, clearly more intelligent than his initial appearance suggested, made a compelling speech in his own defence to the Court:

"I own myself in a great fault for throwing these stones at his Majesty. I was in Greenwich Hospital on the 16th of December last, as an in-pensioner. I had been there eighteen months. The ward-keeper was sweeping the place, and I told him he had no business to sweep it more than once a day; the boatswain's mate abused me, and I returned it. A complaint was then made to Sir Richard Keats (the Governor), and I was expelled for life. I petitioned to the Lords of the Admiralty to have the pension which I had before I went into the hospital restored to me. I am entitled to that pension by an Act passed in the reign of George IV. which entitles a pensioner to have the same pension which he had before he became an in-pensioner, unless he struck an officer, or committed felony, or did anything of the kind, which I did no such thing. On the 19th of last April I petitioned the King to have my pension restored. He answered by sending the petition to the Lords of the Admiralty, and Mr Barrow, the secretary, sent a letter to me at a public-house, the Admiral Duncan, with the same answer the King gave. The answer was that his Majesty could do nothing for me. This was partly in writing and partly in print. I had neither workhouse nor overseer to apply to, and had not broke my fast for three days; mere distress drove me to it. His Majesty never did me an injury, and I am exceedingly sorry I threw a stone or anything else at his Majesty. On the 17th of the present month I went to Admiral Rowley's; he swore at me and kicked me. I can only say I am very sorry for what I have done, and must suffer the law. They had no right to take my pension from me, to which I was entitled by Act of Parliament."[3]

Dennis Collins, an Irish-born sailor, was 57 years old. He volunteered for the Navy In 1797 and served for just over two years before he lost his left leg in an accident whilst stowing the booms on HMS Atalanta. He then became a cook on several Royal Navy ships. He received a pension of £8 a year after losing his leg which was later increased to £14 year. He had been admitted to the Greenwich Hospital on five separate occasions, each time exhibiting unruly behaviour and being asked to leave. Since December 1831 he had been begging and now desperate and with no means of support he felt he had no hope and he might as well be shot or hanged. He made the long walk from London to Ascot to make a final protest to the King and let the authorities end his misery.

The Court heard his admission of being guilty of stone-throwing, and the extenuating circumstances, but as Judge Bosanquet told the jury, they had to decide if the act of throwing the stone was aimed at the King with the intention to cause injury, or whether the stone had accidentally caused injury. The jury returned a guilty verdict of intention to do harm to the King, a highly treasonable offence; the highest crime in the land. The whole Court was packed for the jury’s verdict. There was a collective shocked silence, with many people sympathetic to the prisoner’s plight, as the Judge placed the black cap on his head and said: “Dennis Collins you have been convicted after attentive consideration of your case, of the crime of High Treason, in devising and attempting to do some bodily harm to the person of your King and in lifting up your hand against your Sovereign, you have destroyed that bond of allegiance which binds the King to protect the subject, and the subject to obey the King; and it now becomes my painful duty to pronounce upon you the sentences of the law. It is not for my learned brother who sits by my side, and myself, to offer any prospect of remission by us of the sentence which the law passes upon you. You have stated that you are sorry for the offence you have committed; if so, you can only prove your sincere contrition and repentance to your Sovereign, who you have injured; it is to him alone you can apply and in him alone rests the power of sparing your forfeited life. The sentence of the Court upon you, Dennis Collins is, that you be drawn on a hurdle to the place of execution, where you are to be hanged by the neck until you are dead; your head is then to be severed from your body, which is to be divided into quarters, and to be disposed of as his Majesty shall think fit”. [4] The prisoner betrayed no emotion as the sentence was announced. His greatest fear was that he would be acquitted. He had already said that “If my Priest would give me the Sacrament today I would a great deal be executed tomorrow than turned out into the world to undergo all the misery and starvation that I went through for six months before this happened.”[5] The jurors, before leaving the court, drew up a petition to the King for clemency for the prisoner.

Most of the newspapers reported the trial in great detail, and there was national sympathy for Dennis Collins’ circumstances and a wish for his sentence to be commuted. The trial followed an inquiry into the circumstances of his expulsion from the Greenwich Hospital which exonerated the Governor after Collins was found to have been a rebellious inmate. Nevertheless the public were appalled by his death sentence, and for several days the newspapers were calling for commutation, which the King, a former sailor himself, commuted ten days later to a sentence of transportation for life. Dennis Collins was kept on a prison hulk on the Thames until he was put aboard the Emperor Alexander which left Sheerness on April 10 1833 arriving at Sullivan’s Cove, Van Diemen’s Land (Tasmania) four months later.

This was not the end of the story. Whilst awaiting trial Collins had been visited by a French lady who had purchased from him all his old clothes, including his wooden leg, and who had replaced them with a set of new clothes which he wore at his trial. By the end of September an advertisement appeared in the Hampshire Advertiser, that an exhibition was to be held at the Royal Victoria Archery Rooms, Southampton for a fortnight only where, for one shilling, visitors could promenade around a display of life-like figures of well-known persons. Among the new figures would be a full-length one of Dennis Collins, taken from life, “inhabited in the identical dress he had on when he made the atrocious attempt on his Majesty’s life.”[6] The French woman who had visited Collins in prison was Madame Tussaud who with her sons made wax figures of famous and infamous people for public entertainment.

Madame Tussaud was not the only one to cash in on the notoriety of Dennis Collins. A publisher in Fleet Street was offering whole-length lithographic prints of Dennis Collins from a drawing by W.W. Waite for one shilling and six pence. W.W. Waite was a well-known Abingdon artist. This image was used in a publication detailing the life and trial of Dennis Collins as told to his solicitor.  Even the Judge, Sir John Bernard Bosanquet, cashed in on the public interest in this trial by publishing his own account of the trial. Music hall comedians joked, “Dennis Collins was asked last week how near he was to the King at Ascot – ‘Within a stone’s throw’, he replied”. Poems were written about him, and for a while there was widespread public interest in his story, but Collins would not know about his notoriety. His imprisonment and transportation isolated him from all of it.

On arrival in Tasmania he was put to work on a chain gang in Port Arthur, a penal colony where the hardest criminals were sent. He wore leg irons and was made to do hard labour in harsh conditions. His behaviour did not improve and he was often punished by being put in solitary confinement. Two weeks after his last solitary confinement, on 1 November 1833, he died and was buried in the Wesleyan Churchyard at Port Arthur.[7] 

He had become a household name, but he was not around to know that. He had got his wish. As a felon he no longer had to go hungry or beg for shelter, but his life was still a misery.

Although the Dennis Collins story has disappeared from history books, it had unexpected consequences. The King, whose dithering earlier in the year over the government crisis had made him unpopular, was now reconciled in the public eye. The shock of knowing that the King might have died gave many members of government a jolt. They suddenly realised that if he died before the Princess Victoria came of age her Mother, the formidable Duchess of Kent, would become Regent, a situation nobody relished, so the monarch’s safety became an important issue.

Madame Tussaud’s astute opportunist purchase of Dennis Collin’s clothes enhanced her waxwork exhibition by tapping into the public’s curiosity about notorious figures. However she might not have foreseen that by giving Collins new clothes to wear at his trial, the public perception of the mariner changed. He was seen as no longer a villain but a character who needed sympathy.   

Would-be lawyers can now learn from the published papers of the trial itself which as a text book can be found in law school libraries all over the world, and which is still in print today. The old prison buildings at Port Arthur, Tasmania, which ceased being a prison in 1877, are now a World Heritage Site and tourist attraction. Britain might have forgotten Dennis Collins, but the Tasmanians have not. Recently a play by Richard Davey called “The man who threw a stone”, based on his story, was performed at the very prison where he ended his days


[1] Cawthorne, George James; Herod, Richard S., Royal Ascot: Its History and its Associations, (London, 1902)

[2] Morning Advertiser - Saturday 25 August 1832

[3] Griffiths, Arthur, The Chronicles of Newgate, (London, 1884). The Ex-classics website, https://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ng612.htm

[4] Saunders's News-Letter - Monday 27 August 1832

[5] Morning Advertiser - Saturday 25 August 1832

[6] Hampshire Advertiser - Saturday 29 September 1832

[7] National Maritime Museum of Ireland, https://www.mariner.ie/dennis-collins/

Thursday, 16 April 2020

How Milton used the plague of 1665 as an opportunity,


How Milton used the plague of 1665 as an opportunity, and how we could do the same in these uncertain times.




When the streets and commerce of London came to a standstill during the London plague in 1665 and the disease began to spread rapidly through the population, those that had the means and opportunity left the City for the countryside. King Charles II and his Court first went to Hampton Court and then moved further afield to Oxford.

Other notable thinkers removed themselves from their London bases and returned to their original Counties. Isaac Newton returned to his family’s Cambridgeshire farm. John Milton, who had grown up in Horton, in Buckinghamshire, moved his household to a little cottage in another Buckinghamshire village at Chalfont St Giles. Both men used this enforced down-time for creative thinking, and both made discoveries and progress in their respective fields.

John Milton moved to Chalfont St Giles in 1665 with his third wife, Elizabeth, 30 years his junior, whom he had married 2 years earlier. He was 57 years old and by this time blind and had to dictate his work to his wife and daughters. He had previously led a busy life as Latin Secretary to the Council of State, a teacher and a scholar during which time he had published several minor poems, but he had an idea for an epic poem which had been going round in his mind for some time before he started writing some opening verses in 1642. Since then he spasmodically added more verses when his other occupations allowed. During the English Civil War he made no progress, and he probably resumed writing around 1654. It was only during his enforced isolation in the peace and quiet of his Buckinghamshire cottage that he was able to finally complete his greatest work, Paradise Lost, which was published after the Great Fire of London, in 1667. Without the plague the book might not have been completed and published at this time.

It is not often that we are forced to slow down our busy lives and take stock. This time of self-distancing and isolation should be seen as an opportunity for thought and reflection. Not only can we re-evaluate our goals and ambitions, but with minds that are free from the bustle of life we have a chance to encourage the creative side of our minds. Into our calmer brain will flow ideas and thoughts that have lain dormant whilst we coped with everyday pressure. We should use Milton and Newton as an example of how to turn this terrible situation into an opportunity for personal growth.

Thursday, 12 December 2019

How the election of 1818 changed the public attitude towards elections


The end of the second decade of the nineteenth century saw two General Elections two years apart and history has repeated itself in the same period in the twenty-first century. The current election laws are very different to those in the nineteenth century but the problems the politicians faced were not dissimilar.

The Tories had been in power for six years when the first election after the end of Napoleonic wars took place in 1818. The end of the wars had bought peace, but there was no work for the returning soldiers and the Corn Law restricted imports of wheat and pushed up the price of bread. Poverty and deprivation was causing social unrest, which the Government quashed with draconian legislation. Up to this time the members of parliament were traditionally the major landowners in the constituency area and were usually returned unopposed, but at this election more seats were being contested. People realised they had the power to change things. They did not have to suffer austerity in silence. This was the first time the public (or the small percentage of the population that were eligible to vote) realised they could make a difference. Candidates suddenly found they had to fight for their seats. They did so by inviting voters to election meetings where there was always plenty of food and drink on offer. They would arrange to convey voters to the polls, and they would use all the influence they could muster to entice people to vote for them. It was not a secret vote and afterwards the electoral list and how individuals voted was published. Therefore tenants of the candidate dare not vote against their landlord for fear of losing their farms or their patronage. Supporters were supplied with ribbons, banners and street decoration. Bands accompanied the candidates to their meetings. The candidates found that fighting for their parliamentary seats was becoming expensive.

Middlesex

In today’s 2019 election Boris Johnson is hoping to retain his Middlesex constituency seat of Uxbridge and South Ruislip. This is just one of 32 constituencies in Middlesex. In 1818 there were 14 constituencies in Middlesex which stretched across the whole of the north bank of the Thames from the City of London to the Buckingham/Berkshire/Hertfordshire borders. Middlesex had twelve borough constituencies and two county members of Parliament who represented the rest of Middlesex.

In 1818 George Byng, a member of the Whig (Liberal) party, who after 28 years in the House of Commons once again accepted the nomination of the freeholders to stand as a representative for Middlesex.[1] It was a popular nomination and he had many cheering supporters when the nomination was made. His fellow candidate, William Mellish, a Tory and a governor of the Bank of England, was less enthusiastically nominated. In fact another candidate was considered to replace Mr Mellish. The formal proceedings took place on Friday 26 June 1818 and the freeholders of the county crowded into Brentford, Middlesex, to cast their vote. The road from London to Brentford was thronged with the carriages of the candidates’ supporters. The two seats in Parliament for Middlesex were uncontested, but freeholders wanted to show support for their preferred man, and the candidates put on a show. Mellish left London at 9am in a travelling coach with postillions in scarlet livery. His supporters wore light blue ribbons. Mr Byng’s supporters wore orange and purple ribbons. When both the candidates were present the two sheriffs went through the procedure of the hustings. The King’s Writ requiring two representatives to be elected for Middlesex was read and Mr Byng formerly proposed and seconded. Then Mr Mellish was proposed and seconded. The sheriffs asked if there were any other candidates and Mr Clarke, who had been proposed at an earlier meeting withdrew his candidacy. Both candidates were therefore declared duly elected and were chaired through the streets of Brentford as was the tradition. 

1820 election

The 1820 general election took place between the 6 March and the 14 April 1820 and more seats were being contested. Discontent was growing nationally. A plot to kill leading cabinet members and the Prime Minister was uncovered in February, and the plotters executed. In Scotland a general strike and a movement for more autonomy and independence was growing, but was suppressed when the army were sent to arrest the ringleaders some of whom were later hung and others transported to the colonies. In the 1820 Middlesex election another Whig candidate entered the contest. All three candidates had to work harder at wooing the 10,662 members of the electorate. There were accusations of a coalition between the two Whig candidates which they refuted. However they were both elected and the Tory candidate eliminated.

From this time onwards the populace became aware of the unfairness of the electoral system. Pressure was on MPs to change the system which resulted in the Reform Act of 1832. This Act abolished ‘rotten boroughs’ where a MP was elected for a non-existent borough, and doubled the number of men eligible to vote, although this was still only 18% of the male population of the United Kingdom.

At today’s election there will be more representation, and most of the adult population are eligible to vote. A vote is a privilege that many of fought hard for over the centuries. Let us hope that everyone will make use of this privilege.



[1] Morning Advertiser - Saturday 20 June 1818

Thursday, 24 October 2019

The Village that Street View forgot

Longford Village today

Middlesex as a county has lost its identity under the urbanisation of London. Most Middlesex towns are referred to simply as a London Borough of something. A few places to the north and west, and within the M25 unofficial boundary of Greater London, still proudly proclaim Middlesex as their county, but soon even more of its territory will be removed from our sight, our memory and our history.


The village of Longford will disappear with the expansion of Heathrow airport. To those that live there it will be a sad bitter time. To those that have yet to visit the village it will be a disappointment to find that you are unable to use Google’s Street View app to navigate through its streets. Street View cameras have only ventured to the outskirts of the village and omitted to capture any images of the historic core. Why is this? Street View has not offered an explanation to me. Was it a deliberate omission requested by the Government to stop any record of the village being preserved prior to its demolition, or just a casual mistake?

The village of Longford, within the London Green Belt and a Conservation Area, is a peaceful (ignoring the sound of screaming jets overhead) rural setting which has hardly altered over time. It has nine Grade II listed buildings, and five others of special architectural interest. The village, from Saxon times and earlier, has been a farming community. The prime horticultural land grew fruit and vegetables for London’s Covent Garden market. It straddles the Great Bath Road from where, for centuries, its four inns provided travellers with hospitality. Six miles from Windsor Castle the village was the usual stopping place for the Royals to change their horses on the way to and from London and Windsor.
Longford Village 1920

The villagers were witnesses to many events, rejoicing at some and turning a blind eye to others. Highwaymen prayed on the coach travellers who had to cross the notorious Hounslow Heath to get to Longford, but if any villagers were aware of the culprits they kept it to themselves. With four rivers (two artificial) and acres of orchards and market gardens it was a thriving rural community up to the second world war when an airfield was built nearby to aid the war effort. This airport became the country’s main civil airport at Heathrow and from then on Longford was blighted. It has been threatened with extinction since the fifties, but the cohesive supportive community are proud of its history and have fought to prevent its destruction.

Google’s Street View boasts that it now has full coverage of the road networks for the whole of the United Kingdom, so why is Longford missing? Street View is not just a tool for navigation, but is becoming a social history resource. Google has an ongoing programme of re-surveying and, whilst the current image is presented to the user first, a clock symbol in the top-left of the screen can be clicked to see older images. This is a great asset to family or local history researchers, or just the curious, who want to track the transition of locations through time.

Sadly, because the village of Longford has not been visited by the Street View cameras, when the third runway is built no one will be able to see images of the village that once stood there, and with the loss of images will also go the story of centuries of village life. To preserve Longford’s history I am writing a book on the life of the village through time. Even if the physical village disappears I hope the lives, loves, tragedies and triumphs of its people will live on in print.

The Colne River, Longford, today


Monday, 14 October 2019

The Giraffe That Could Not Stand Up


The Giraffe That Could Not Stand Up

George III’s son, the Prince Regent, was a man of excess. He loved elaborate architecture, glamorous women, and excessive amounts of good food and drink. He also liked exotic animals. He begun accumulating rare animals many of whom were presents from Heads of State who were trying to ingratiate themselves with the British monarchy. The King housed these animals in a menagerie in Windsor Great Park built next to the crenellated mock-gothic mansion in Windsor Great Park called Sandpit Gate Lodge.

Sandpit Gate Lodge 2011. Privately owned since 1995.

By the time the Prince Regent became King George IV in 1820 this menagerie had grown and there were, among other creatures, gnus, black buck, kangaroos, and a variety of exotic birds, but his most prized possession was still to come.  On 11 August 1827 an eighteen-month old Namibian giraffe arrived in London a gift from Mehmit Ali, Pasha of Egypt. The giraffe was eighteen months old and although not fully grown was already ten feet tall. She was the first giraffe in Britain and arrived with two cows to provide it with milk and two Egyptian attendants who did not speak a word of English. She was a great curiosity because many believed that giraffes were just a myth and didn’t actually exist. The British people suddenly became fascinated with anything to do with giraffes. Magazines promoted fashions and furnishings that matched the design and colour of the giraffe’s skin. Household objects and ceramics celebrated this animal and newspapers throughout the country carried regular reports on the giraffe.

The animals at Sandpit Gate Lodge were kept in specially constructed enclosures each with thatched-roofed sheds, but a special building was constructed for the giraffe with stable-type double doors twelve foot high. She was an amiable creature who was happy to be petted and stroked. She was painted for George IV by Jacues-Laurent Agasse in 1827, with a degree of artistic licence.[1]


The painting shows the giraffe standing with its two cows and two Egyptian attendants, but this is an idealised image of the giraffe. In real life it had difficulty standing up. The poor creature had been captured in Sudan as a calf and endured a year-long journey over land and sea before it arrived in London. During the first part of the journey it was too weak to walk for long periods so it had been strapped to a camel with it legs tied together. The tightness of the binding and the long journey resulted in the knees becoming deformed, and varies remedies were tried to restore it to health.

King George IV was delighted with his gift, and had great sympathy with his crippled giraffe. He too, because of gout and obesity, had a weakness of the knees. The King was 64 in August 1827 and spent nearly all his time at the Royal Lodge in Windsor Great Park from where he took daily carriage rides around Windsor Great Park which included stopping at Sandpit Gate Lodge to spend time with the animals and check on the health of his prized giraffe.


Melville, King George IV taking his favourite exercise, near the Sandpit Gate, Windsor Park. 1830 (Royal Collection)

Although the giraffe grew over a foot in height whilst at Windsor it never reached a normal height for a giraffe. The King and the giraffe were in synchronised decline and by July 1828 both were unable to stand on their own and were growing weaker. At the menagerie a hoist and sling were constructed to allow the giraffe to stand upright and newspapers throughout the land printed daily bulletins on the giraffe’s condition. [2]  Both the giraffe and the unpopular King were ridiculed in song and pictures.

A caricature by William Heath, 1829 showing George IV and his mistress Lady Conyngham trying to lift the giraffe by pulley.

George IV and the nation were very upset when the giraffe finally died on 11 October 1829. It was taken to the Zoological Gardens in Regent’s Park for dissection.  A taxidermist, Mr John Gould, was asked to make a replica of the giraffe using a wooden form covered with the animal’s skin. The skeleton of the animal was exhibited alongside the stuffed model at the Zoological Society’s Museum until it closed in August 1855. Their current whereabouts are unknown.
George IV outlived the giraffe by only eight months. When William IV inherited the throne the menagerie was disbanded and the animals and birds moved to the new London Zoo at Regents Park, together with the residue of the Royal Menagerie still held at the Tower of London. The London Zoological Society received its Royal Charter in 1829 from George IV, and it has had a Royal Patron ever since.

I came across this story whilst researching my family history. My great, great, great, great grandfather, William Kell, was an usher to George IV and lived at Sandpit Gate Lodge at the time of the menagerie. His exact role in the royal household is unknown, but his proximity to the menagerie and the fact that Edward Cross (shown with the giraffe and the Egyptians in the picture above) was the executor of his Will indicates that he performed a duty connected with the giraffe and animals.



[1]  Nubian Giraffe (1827), Jacques-Laurent Agasse Photograph: Royal Collection Trust / © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2015 www.royalcollection.org.uk
[2] Lancaster Gazette – Saturday 12 July 1828; Edinburgh Evening Courant - Monday 19 May 1828; Clonmel Herald - Wednesday 04 November 1829